reprinted from the Nov/Dec 1993 Free Minds Journal
Secret Files of the Watchtower
Deceiving the Authorities
by Soren Bo Henricksen
On the night of July 23, 1991 a burglary was committed aguinst the Danish brunch office of Jehovah's Witnesses in Holbsek, Denmark. The police were told that a considerable amount of money, together with "some documents" had been stolen. Holbaek Amis Venstreblad, the local newspaper, published an extensive story about the burglary. Just an ordinary crime, or so it seemed.
But on May 17, 1992 the Copenhagen daily Politiken informed the public that a confidential file containing deeply personal information about expelled members of the JWs had been stolen. The existence and the scale of this file came as a big surprise to most people, including expelled Witnesses who never knew they had been registered.
On the basis of the information produced by the press, the Registertilsyn (the Danish government's "Inspection of Registers") went into the case around the 20th of May. The Registertilsyn declared on Sept. 14 that the register in question was unlawful. Jehovah's Witnesses received an order to destroy all the personal information referring to disciplinary cases and their treatment by November 1992. A short time before this deadline the JW branch office stated that they had carried out the order of the Registertilsyn.
The Purity of the Congregation
Many have asked: "Why do the JWs need a file like that?" and "Will the organization really follow the order of the Registertilsyn to destroy it and comply with the order in the future?"
The disfellowshiping policy of the Watchtower organization is an inseparable part of the teaching of the sect. The "demand of purity" is at the basis of the policy of disfellowshiping, which is the cornerstone of much of the organized religious life within the sect.
Witnesses live according to the principle that "a little leaven ferments the whole lump." When it comes to disciplinary cases this principle is enforced in a very consistent and absolute manner. For them, obedience to God comes before obedience to the laws of the country if they think that a law prevents them from complying with a Biblical commandment.
God's Interests On Earth
To the Watchtower this means that whatever the authorities may decide in this matter, they will only comply with an order inasmuch as it does not prevent the sect from keeping the information needed for the control of a sinner in order that he constitutes no threat to "the demand for purity" at some later time.
Therefore it is doubtful whether they will comply with the demand of the Registertilsyn. Given their organizational policy they will not be able to accept the banning of registration of persons against whom disciplinary cases have been conducted. Typically the argument would be that leaders need to know what the case was about, the person's attitude to and behavior in the case, and the need to "protect" the congregation against a potentially harmful influence from the person concerned.
To throw some light upon the willingness of the Watchtower to follow the order of the Registertilsyn in this case, I shall present a number of quotations from their Watchtower literature. The citations are not only illustrative, but they are part of the "Iaw" that the Watchtower wants to follow in a case like this.
The context of the quotations presented is the Watchtower's claim to stand on Biblical ground when saying that there are situations where it is justifiable to lie, speak "half truths" or conceal facts if the "loyalty" to God and his interests on earth demands so.
Delusion In Times Of War
The Watchtower of February 1, 1956 printed an article that told JWs how to react towards those who resist or persecute them:
The enemies did not deserve to learn the truth to the hurt or endangerment of Jehovah's servants. In wartime it is proper to misdirect the wolfish enemy. (p.80)
In wartime if is proper to misdirect ... Please remember that JWs feel they are in a state of spiritual warfare with society outside their own organization. This world is under Satan's power. Consequently the maneuvers that Witnesses might consider appropriate for covering up their acts will aIways be justified.
Since the unchristian wolves declare war upon the sheep and choose to make themselves 'fighters actually against God,' it is proper for the inoffensive 'sheep' to use war strategy toward the wolves in the interests of God's work.. No one against whom this strategy is used is unrighteously hurt because of it, whereas the 'sheep' or those interests that deserve to be protected are safeguarded. God does not oblige us to show the stupidity of sheep and play into the hands of our fighting enemy...
It is proper to cover over our arrangements for the work that God commands us to do. If the wolfish foes draw wrong conclusions from our maneuvers to outwit them, no harm has been done to them by the harmless sheep, innocent in their motives as doves.... (p. 86)
...lf for conscientious reasons he (i.e., a faithful witness) refuses to tell everything, he will be willing to suffer the consequences if he be judged deserving a penalty. He refuses to tell everything, not to escape punishment, but facing punishment for conscientious reasons... (p. 89)
He refuses to tell everything for conscientious reasons. To a Jehovah's Witness Conscientious reasons" means keeping a clean conscience before God and the supreme leadership of the Watchtower organization, the Governing Body.
Supression of Facts
The Branch Office Procedure manual contains instructions to the leadership of national offices concerning treatment of "unfortunate" information. In chapter 24:11 it says, among other things:
Also, have in mind the possible effect of the article on the people living in your territory. Sometimes it is best not to say certain things, even though they are true. Be careful not to submit material for publication that might cause difficulty for our brothers, or for the work in your country. (emphasis theirs)
The Watchtower of Sept. 1, 1960 dealt with the question of whether one must aIways speak the truth. On page 351-2 it said:
God's Word commands: "Speak truth each of you with his neighbor." (Eph. 4:25) This command, however, does not mean that we should tell everyone who asks us all he wants to know. We must tell the truth to one who is entitled to know, but if one is not so entitled we may be evasive. But we may not tell a falsehood....
There is one exception, however, that the Christian must ever bear in mind. As a soldier of Christ he is in theocratic warfare and he must exercise added caution when dealing with God's foes. Thus the Scriptures show that for the purpose of protecting the interests of God's cause, it is proper to hide the truth for God's enemies...
This would come under the term "war strategy," as explained in The Watchtower, February 1, 1956, and is in keeping with Jesus' counsel that when among wolves we must be as "cautious as serpents." Should circumstances require a Christian to take the witness stand and swear to tell the truth, then, if he speaks at all, he must utter the truth. When faced with the alternative of speaking and betraying his brothers or not speaking and being held in contempt of court the mature Christian will put the welfare of his brothers ahead of his own, remembering Jesus' words: "No one has greater love than this, that someone should surrender his (life) in behalf of his friends."
By the expression "God's foes" is meant all who are not Jehovah's Witnesses, especially those who speak negatively of JWs or who work against them. The expression "the interests of God's cause" comprises among other things that you endeavor to maintain the "demand of purity."
The Truth About the Case
The fact that the JWs will tell lies if necessaryaIso in order to cover up things that are embarrassing to themhas been shown by this "file case" several times. At times the organization denied the existence of such files when the newspapers reported it stolen. Jorgen Larsen and Erik Jorgensen (both from the branch office in Holbaek) have spoken lies several times in newspapers and on the news program of Denmark's Channel 2. They denied several facts that later became public knowledge. The verdict of the Registertilsyn itself even contains examples that the information given by the Watchtower is not truthful. According to pages 3 and 4 in the verdict the Watchtower has claimed: a) A registration is only kept for 5 years after a readmittance. b) The number of cases in each local file is limited to somewhere between zero and "maybe" 7 or 10, and the organization conveys to us the impression that it is a matter of about 2300 cases altogether.
Concerning point (a) the Copenhagen daily Politiken was able to disprove this claim, e.g., by means of a facsimile showing that several of the registered cases were more than 40 years old and were stamped "Must not be destroyed," and aIso in cases where the expelled Witness had been readmitted.
The Extent of the Files
As far as the extent of the registration is concerned (point b), the JWs have today about 225 congregations in Denmark, which gives a statistical average of 10 files for each congregation. If there are congregations without any registered cases, it can only be a matter of recently formed congregations. By means of simple calculation, however, the figure starts to look different. Aher 40 years with 100 to 150 cases a year (according to the Politiken of May 21, 1992), based on figures from the JWs the real number becomes 4000 to 6000 cases.
One thing we must not overlook is the fact that the files aIso comprise disciplinary cases which have not led to disfellowshipinq. Any disciplinary case leading to a "reprimand," whether it be "public" (before the congregation) or "private" (only in the presence of the accused), is registered and reported to the branch office in Holbaek (in accordance with the "demand of purity"). The Politiken of May 24, 1992 brought the example of a disciplinary case against a Witness who had partaken in the Regatta 'Round Seeland which was not considered proper.
(Translation from Danish by Frans Mikkelsen).
back to Watchtower History